ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the effects of surgical and conservative therapy in the treatment of orbital blow-out fracture. Methods: 90 cases of obital blow-out fracture were treated by surgical(n = 40) and conservative(n = 50) trerapy respectively, the patients were fllowed up for 12 months. The treatment outcome was retrospectively analysed. Results: Of the 40 patients managed surgically 39 were with complete follow up data, 19 had diplopia in peripheral gaze before surgery, 13 (33％) had at 3-month and 12 (31％) had at 6-month follow-up. 31 had enophthalmus before surgery and 3(8％) had at 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Of the 50 patients managed conservatively 26 were with complete follow-up data, 11 had diplopia in peripheral gaze initially, 9(35％) had at 3-month and 8(31％) had at 6-month follow-up. 15 had enophthalmus initially and 13(50％) had at 3-month and 6-month followup. Conclusion: Surgical therapy is more effective for the treatment of enophthalmus. The effects tend to be stable 3 months after treatment, the ratio of diplopia in peripheral gaze after treatment by the 2 treatments is similar(about 30％ of the total cases).